Utah District Court
CMECF Updates
Monday, March 05, 2007
  Notice of Conventional Filing Does Not "Reserve" Filing Date
Judge Kimball recently revealed that an attorney was using an e-filed Notice of Conventional Filing to "bookmark" a spot on the docket; stamping document caption pages at the all-night filing box outside the court; and then returning to the court days later to actually deposit the documents in the all-night filing box using the caption cover pages stamped days earlier.

2/16/2007 at 9:53 PM - Notice of Conventional Filing e-filed
2/16/2007 at 10:11 PM - Date stamp on face of documents
2/21/07 (morning) - Documents retrieved by court staff from all-night filing box, found in between other documents bearing 2/20/07 date stamp

The caption pages stamped 2/16/07 were attached to the documents pulled from the all night filing box on February 21st. If they had actually been deposited on the 16th, they would have been pulled from the box on the morning of February 20th, after the Presidents' Day Holiday. But the documents were not in the stack of documents pulled from the box that date. They were pulled from the box the morning of February 21st.
Judge Kimball ordered the documents to be docketed as of February 20th, the day before they were actually found in the all-night filing box, not as of the February 16th date of the face page stamp which was also the date of the electronically filed Notice of Conventional Filing. Judge Kimball also ordered that "counsel for both parties are hereby notified that they are not to electronically file any 'Notice of Conventional Filing' until after the document actually has been filed with the court." (The timing of the Notice is not specifically state in the court's Administrative Procedures.
Judge Kimball also gave notice that serious sanctions would apply to such conduct in the future:
"Accordingly, counsel is hereby notified that, if any such conduct is again observed by court staff, the court will strike the document(s) at issue and therefore will not consider the document(s) in deciding any related motion."
The February 16th Notice of Conventional Filing was itself strange, reciting the documents were conventionally filed January 19th. Review of the record in the case shows another Notice of Conventional Filing was e-filed on January 19th. But the documents referenced in that Notice were not actually docketed until January 23rd, even though they would have been expected to be in the all-night filing box the morning of January 22nd.
Comments: Post a Comment

<< Home
Unofficial information regarding Utah District Court CM/ECF Electronic Filing.

Official Information 
Log in to CM/ECF

Send any corrections to mj.nuffer@utd.uscourts.gov
Get a feed at http://utd-cmecf.blogspot.com/atom.xml

Location: Salt Lake City, Utah, United States
December 2004 / January 2005 / February 2005 / March 2005 / April 2005 / May 2005 / June 2005 / July 2005 / September 2005 / October 2005 / November 2005 / December 2005 / January 2006 / February 2006 / March 2006 / April 2006 / May 2006 / June 2006 / July 2006 / August 2006 / September 2006 / October 2006 / November 2006 / December 2006 / February 2007 / March 2007 / June 2007 / July 2007 / August 2007 / October 2007 / November 2007 / January 2008 / February 2008 / March 2008 / April 2008 / May 2008 / July 2008 / September 2008 / October 2008 / November 2008 / December 2008 / January 2009 / March 2009 / April 2009 / July 2009 / September 2009 / October 2009 / January 2010 /

Powered by Blogger